Badoo.com Incident of lulz

Cross Chatting LULZ

Site users creating cross chat for lulz using a phone number.

Wow what a odd title, yes it is a bit odd but also rather amusing once you read further on what it is.
If you struck a note and know exactly what it is that would be because you have either done it or know someone who has, fair play to you.

First of here is the joker and she being a good looking woman(I shall refrain from the use of lady at present) certainly would attract allot of male attention to which probably gets men throwing their numbers at them without even saying hello.

badoojoanne24.2

Joanne from Market Harborough

[ad]

It start of simple enough with me sending a descent message, complimenting how attractive she looks and so on. Her profile description had said “Just say hello” so i messaged and said hello.

What i got back was a Telephone number, no words or any responding text at all so i thought lets text it. Oddly the response was not Joanne but of course another man by the name of Darin. Quickly i had determined what this young woman had actually done so i messaged her knowing i would get no reply.

Then a voice call was made, our theories turned out to be correct.

I don’t know what other peoples opinions are regarding this but to me i found it funny. Its hard to take dating sites seriously anymore, if you don’t know what i mean you should read my other post from Evow.

Now if someone is messaging you on a dating site and you just end up getting someones number out the blue before you have even spoken to them properly it is fair guess to suspect this kind of situation is occurring. Now although i found it rather funny i am certain others would not, in fact the other guy who was affected because of Joanne did not sound very happy at all. I think he was a little upset, Dude i know its a sick trick but seriously lighten up a little, after all this trick was pulled on me too lol.

There is something that concerns me out of this and i think it has a clear message to drill home. Ever read or heard the story of boy cried wolf, there will be occasions when this will be a genuine situation which will be seen as just another joke. That could well cause harm but in all fairness if you end up with a number from a stranger you contacted that you have not actually chatted with for a good period of time before exchanging numbers then i guess 9/10 its going to be a prank.

The second thing it indicates as a lesson to take away from this is that there are men out there that are happy just to dump there numbers out to strangers on the Internet, whether its on dating websites or not. Guys seriously your doing it wrong. My concern is that due to the actions of this woman now a total stranger actually has my number which actually raises a whole new set of dangers. For the most part the inconsiderate and foolish actions of another could well end up with a catastrophic outcome.

Take what you will in a teaching from this post and think about it, use your intelligence and consider the effects of your actions.

73’s all the best and stay safe, f1r31c3r signing off. Well i am actually off to cook me my dinner as i have a nice chicken breast marinating in the fridge that i fully intend to enjoy after cooking with a nice glass of red wine.

ez readers

[ad]

Karma

A question i ask you a Question!

 

Recently on facebook someone posted about Karma. Interesting subject and one that is rather contradictory at times not to mention open to opinion one which i think i had in the comments to my friend who posted the status on karma.

It was asked on there status:

who is the person that deals with karma ? who says, what wrong deserves what punishment ??

For which i replied, note this is my opinion based as a response i thought i would blog for your food for thought. Continue reading

UK Council TAX summons scandal Followup

Follow up to the council tax scandal

 

Hello all and thank you to everyone who left all the great feedback and lovely comments.

In response to many comment’s including a full set of new developments over the past months i feel compelled to share the findings with you the world.

As with everything i say in my blogs i always meet my words and this time is no exception. In fact this follow up post has something of a treat for you all.

Following my post on UK council TAX scandal corruption I had mentioned contacting your local constituent well I did. That being Nicky Morgan, nice enough lady well i linked her to my post which she had read and gave me a written reply by mail.

This i would like to share with the world, i have blanked out personal info and uploaded as so all can read the letter.

Some very interesting points and small technicality corrections on my post. yes it might make you giggle.

For the case Nicky responds to she consulted the deputy director at charnwood borough council called David Platts. I am releasing this info not in a slanderous manor at all, it is just for completeness.

The following was pulled out and quoted from the previous post

In the event of failure to pay council TAX twice, the individual in question is summoned to court and required to pay £62.50 for court costs.

She admits this is the case and goes on to say that it may only take one payment before a summons is issued. This again proves that the system is broken in that the so called reminder notices sent are enough to be considered a defaulted payment. It is correctly said that the reminder notice is then sent approximately 14 days after the supposed payment was missed. In reality even if you paid it late the notice will still arrive. When a person tries to speak to the department all they tend to get is, the computer automatically issues the notice etc and you don’t have a leg to stand on. Seriously if you cant get the software developers to make the system work for human beings then you need to find a developer that can. Were not robots, were human beings, meaning were alive and actually understand the word maybe, sort of, kind of not just yes or no, on or off.

I am assured that the policy for the first bill is just a bill and only after 14 days is the notice sent. Well now there is a thing you see  the council and there minions are not perfect. What i mean is they make mistakes them selves, there staff make miscalculations whatever the situation, the computer sometimes fails as mentioned above it does not take into consideration all possible variables, misfortunate events and so on. At which point you the average Jo public have no idea in many cases how this all works or even how to sort it. In many cases you just pay it to shut them up and get them off your back.

No where in the letter I got in response to my post from Nicky Morgan does it mention or address isues like this. How many times in the past 20 years ++ has a person paid these costs unfairly because they either could not handle the stress or had no idea how to.

Nowhere in the document does it also mention that it is illegal or legal for the arrogant members of staff in the department who are 100% dismissive and blame the computer system “Its the computer and that’s the way it is”.

As i mentioned in my original post I go on to say how if someone is paying there council TAX can be summoned. If someone is very hard up, that means struggling with there finances and was unable to pay on the exact date but pays it later in the month he would still get a summons. The unfair treatment of this is not addressed in the corresponding letter of response. Cleverly avoiding the main issues i would say there Nicky! good one.

It gets better as the letter goes on to speak about:

There is a discrepancy regarding the payment date being set as the first of each month. If people recieve there salary at the end of the month, funds take 3 days to clear, in which time they may already be late to pay there council TAX and face paying an extra £62.50(summons cost)

Once again the political correctness of cleverly worded paragraph follows explaining how they calculate the financial year. Stating that plans run from the 1st April to the 1st January and only by direct debit does the council allow further payment date options to be the 3rd and 25th of every month, with 14 days prior to the payment date, you are to be issued with a notice that payment is due on this date(generally 14 days of the date of letter).  Basically your life means nothing, diddle squat, finito, worthless to them, just pay on that date that’s the way our system works. That’s our rules and you will abide by our rules, there is no highway just our way.

Now about the court hearing. There seems to be a slight discrepancy about this, something that i think central government would like to look into. I wont release recorded telephone calls incriminating the person(individual) in this area but it is a concern that i personally don’t think will be dealt with. It is the scaremongering, the threatening behaviour . You must at all costs not allow them to get to you in this way.

I spoke about them not letting you in to put your case forward to the judge and as mentioned above the staff attitude from the enforcement department is disgusting to say the least. If you actually get a smile out of them you have done well. The phone call i mentioned regarding this actually records not a singular member of staff but more than one on different occasions  clearly stating that in there belief it is pointless even going to court as you wont be allowed to enter the court room, so pay the summons cost(outstanding balance) in full before the court hearing and we shall remove it from the court. Note the remove from the court but not removal of summons costs. follow this up by:

“But if i am to pay £62.50 i want to get what i pay for and want my hearing before the court, I shall take my picnic basket and the kids, be a nice day out don’t you think? Bargain for £62.50. Do they have a kettle for the instant pot noodle.”

That sounds just like a hustle would you not say, direct from the council departments enforcement staff. I mean this in a non sexist way but all these so called officers were female. All the contacts with a male officer were not met with this ferocity or tack and deserves nothing more than the type of response I have given above.

  • Bellow are the high resolution scanned images of the letter i received.



  • And page 2



To conclude:

The bellow as before in my post if followed and strongly fought you will win.

Make sure you follow the additional steps listed bellow, all chargeable if asked to do something further:
  1. Follow there complaints procedure and exhaust it completely to the point nothing further can be done to resolve the situation.
  2. File the complaint that had not been resolved by the local authority to the local government ombudsmen along with the complaint response correspondence you got from the above complaint procedure.
  3. File the further complaint if both the above failed to the government ombudsmen with all the above correspondence and so on. Find further information on this here. Dont forget togoogle search too
  4. Invoice the council for all your time, charges etc. Do everything possible to get paid and then pay of there charges. Take the excess money you have earned from the above and give it to charity or a random homeless person on the street. At least by him a bottle of booze with some of it, share it out etc. Now that’s public money well spent lol just kidding.
  5. Further note to this would be to also contact your elected constituent and keep mailing them all the outcomes, concerns complaints views you have crucial improvements and actions your taking as when corruption like this happens it really does no good for there image or respectability.

UK Council TAX Scandal corruption summons

Council TAX practice worst than the bankers.

Hello my good readers and welcome to another blog post on a serious note regarding council TAX in the UK. The scandalous scheming cons and how a agreement passed in 1992 by the previous conservative government has come back to attack the poor.

We all know how annoying and painstaking it can be trying to communicate and resolve issues with the council TAX departments across the UK or should we call them local criminals.

Interestingly here is the 1992 legislation for council TAX enforcement that we will refer to bellow:

Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992, particularly Regulations 33 to 35.

Now you may think the above is all in order and perfectly fine, we all have to pay the TAX blabla blaaa. Yes i agree and yes we do as council TAX pays for the police force, Fire service, refuse and street cleaning as well as the salt gritters, pedestrianized repair/development drainage etc. Weather you like it or not we all need and enjoy these services that it provides so we pay for it.

The problem begins when local councils begin to pervert the above regulation sections 33 and 35. Just when you thought it was all fine to have such a regulation it gets perverted out of all control and in today’s day 20 years since it was made this perverted legislation busts out into the open for some to see, hopefully now everyone can see it.

It is fair to say that the legislation (if you have not read it already) states that on two defaults meaning you fail to pay your council TAX not once but twice you will be summoned to court to be challenged as to why you failed to pay your council TAX not once but twice, fair comment so far would you not say.

Summons costs at present are £62.50 and for a low income person/families this is allot of money, if there circumstances are difficult there council TAX alone is hard to pay. Hitting them with another £62.50 summons cost is really not the way to go for starters. It makes me laugh when the government criticize bankers for there bonuses and or bank charges and then they them selves are guilty beyond all question of a doubt of the same criminal activity.

Now the argument against this is that people who default and do not(maybe they refuse to pay) there council TAX must be summoned and it is the cost of the court for which the £62.50 is for. Because the council TAX enforcement is actually run by public money (Council TAX oh yea your money is not just for fire service and so on but also to pay for the collection and accountant staff on stupidly high wages that we could do without or at least cut the cost to).  The summons cost is to be paid by the person(s) not paying there council TAX. I am sure many readers are saying tuff tits at the screen right now regarding this but remember if someone is having difficulty paying there council TAX due to low income or whatever, is it fair to hit them with a higher bill.

If you think the above is fair or unfair you have not heard the worst of it yet so read on. Continue reading

RBS Bonuses and ACTA

I recently got an email from an organization called 98 degrees who were contacting me in regard to RBS Bonuses.

It is a concerning issue that the country taxes the little man who is on less than 20k/annum. These people who earn over 50000.00/annum are taxed @ 50% Income tax but they receive bonuses annually additional to there income. These bonuses are not taxed like wages. It would be a fair comment to say lets tax there bonuses @ 60%, the 60% tax would become public property and would finance the NHS and further public services. By taxing these bonuses across the board one can limit the amount of money they would be awarding and in effect keep more in the system, putting it back where it is needed. That to me sounds like a fairer Briton.

Here is the reply i wrote to 38 Degrees in regard to bonuses ACTA and recent events that no one is targeting in fact there making a big commission with no solution.

 

Hi 38 Degrees

Yes i did hear about this person getting a massive bonus. I dont think
attacking him directly is the answer. Attacking the ideals and immoral
aspect of this is what should be happening. Getting the government to
place a high TAX like 60% tax on bonuses for these people. weather it
be in shares or money. For instance The shares that were worth £999,000
@ 60% TAX would then be owned by the general public which in turn could
fund our NHS country development and so on much better. It would give
the average Jo a relief and allow for a much lesser Income TAX for
those on less than 20K a year. I think 20-24% Income tax for someone on
12K a year is wrong.

The wealthy need to put more back into the system, why should they be
the only ones who are allowed to enjoy a fulfilled life while others
struggle and suffer. My local council has once again stopped giving out
bin bags, even though i pay a huge amount a month on council tax we get
no bin liners.

Also the one culture changing factor that has fuelled a bit of piece
hope and self education in our lives above the rich and wealthy with
there proclaimed bonuses is the new ACTA bill which aims to keep the
richer rich rather than keep an open free trade market. Being a Open
Source software developer and allowing stupid USA patents mainly one in
particular(that states if you did not build the software yourself you
must pay to use it) taken out by microsoft would be effective in the UK
if the bill is accepted by the EU. The UK has already signed it, this
affects me directly as i program software share it free into the
community which in turn gets debuged by the many. They get the use it i
get to use the debugged version and we all contribute making a free
open commerce of innovation creative and very useful software that
everyone anywhere in the world can enjoy.

The ACTA act will allow patents operating in america to be enforced
globally, as mentioned above the USA patent system does not work as it
allows Microsoft to stop free open source software that has helped
billions of people enjoy learning the internet, education into
programming without any commercial cost, provided a cost assured
economical solution to today’s servers allowing small companies to get
of the ground without licence costs.

Everyone is pointing the finger but no one is targeting the issue
directly. Let him have his bonuses because next year they will all be
given bonuses again and the next year and again and again. TAX the damn
thing that’s what VAT was for in concern to shops so do the same with
there bonuses. Clamp it down so that the money they take out can be put
back into the system and continue the perfect circle.

At the moment ACTA is due to break that circle and seen as nothing is
being done about the bankers bonuses this will continue to break the
perfect circle meaning poverty, filth, and so on will prevail. Beer in
pubs is already priced the poor to drink at home and with the
supermarkets rising the price per bottle that will be unaffordable too.
The future is looking dark and violent. The rules the fat cats play by
needs to change, a 3 year old can see that.

Our freedom is destroyed (Intelectual Property protection)

The real deal SOPA PIPA IPP

As i am sure most people are aware of the recent commotion regarding the SOPA bill, yet something many have let slip by or have not realized has slipped by. Something that has been about for quite a few years that is imperative that it is confined to the furnace bin never to be exercised again.

Intellectual Property Protection, the biggest most frightening problem we have regarding our freedom on the Internet today. Its the real heart(root) of the whole need for SOPA.

If alarm bells are not ringing in your head by now well they should be. Intellectual property protection is known as software patents where its primary purpose is to patent software technology. This is to include things like software alogarythms or complex software design. Things like HTML language or mathematical applications such as Matlab.

The problem begins when someone patents a program like Matlab or Autocad. This patent allows them to become a monopoly. If you or anyone else decide to make a similar program it violates there patent and means you must pay them royalty. You probably think well this is ok, then how does healthy competition occur. There are more than one way to skin a cat meaning you could make something to do the same thing just in not the same way your they did it. All that said this is only implicated if someone intends to sell the product commercially. Rightly so as your invention deserves royalty paid to you, you did invent it after all. What happens when it is not an invention?

The above video is a great resource provided by google in regard to patents and its terrible down falls, highly destructive nature, specifically to the public. Although it helps to fuel investment for large corporations this is non focused on the public. A great example in this video was that a 20 year software patent is a strain on innovation, restricting future competitors resulting in stupendously high prices. When another competitor arrives on the market to offer a cheaper maybe even better solution they are then crushed by the exclusive large firm explained @20:18 in the above video.

  • The video bellow is Linus Torvoids talking about Microsoft now in todays day being the infringing exclusive firm on our freedom and human rights.

Of course it is clear that granting exclusive rights to companies is a great way to bring in investment, share holders and the likes so that the technology and or software can progress to a further commercial stage. That said it is also clear that with the granted right comes detrimental destructive use that is used for monopolizing a product. Further more it infringes on our freedom in such a way that our choices are forced to have to comply with the companies exclusive rights. This is clearly seen in the open source Linux space where nothing is commercial or is sold, in fact it is yielding far more innovation than commercial software vendors. The open source space has taken a huge battering from Microsoft in that patent claims have cause very limited video and sound drivers, graphics and multimedia application innovation to a halt.

Even worst for those that did not catch it in the first video @34:13 what an amazing example of infringement of human rights if we can still call them that. A patent taken out not(NOT) buy the scientist who developed the abortion method but a random patent filed granting him exclusive rights to weather a woman in America can have a first trimester abortion or not, clearly infringing on her constitutional right. Do you still think this is not a problem?

Why? as mentioned in the video software innovation is driven buy incentive from customers needs. most software companies build a software package to a customers need so in all due respect it is the customer that is the inventor. Should he not own the patent?

There is a law within the UK that if anyone else knows about the invention it automatically becomes NON patentable no matter what you do it can not be patented as it is not unique anymore. Only the inventor and the patent office or persons directly involved in the patent know about it until the day it is filed. Therefore the above customer driven incentive/innovation would and could not be patented, obtaining a patent in this area would be void due to obtaining it under false pretenses. You falsified your claim stating that you were the sole inventor of the technology.

I may be further updating this post as and when new information develops or further study develops a worthy blog. Bellow is a video blog from a youtuber who shares his understandings and points about software patents. Very interesting video of his points many i agree with.

Guys are supposed to chase the women

Hello all

Just another crazy sane blog post haha.

Its a new year frosh 2012 and i cant speak for others yet i fell there is allot of love in the air, with valentines approaching in February and the time moving very fast it pleases me to see people actually paying attention to courting and the fun aspects of dating and relationships.

A friend of mine on FaceBook posted an intriguing status which got a fair level of attention something that men related to more than women, maybe it has to do with the lack of education in schools today in relationships and dating. Saying that though i dont think its is the schools problem to teach children today the correct respectful way to treat a lady or approach a lady if one wants to fall in love with her. It is of course the parents responsibility yet parents can only teach there children if they know how to themselves. Thats why it is very important to have both parents mother and father in any upbringing.

Cutting to the chase the status i found intriguing that triggered me to post this was:

  • Ur the guy, ur supposed 2 chase after us. we pretend not 2 notice u because we want 2 c how hard u r willing 2 try. 😉

Apart from the modern short hand lingo or urban dictionary usage she has a very valid and intriguing post. In this response the word STALKER is used which poses an interesting point by some other posts posted in the comments one was:

  • If you chase and they don’t like it your a STALKER

Me being me i could not resist but respond to this with:

I agree but you still need to give a dog a bone as one puts it. Due to the reaction from some women calling men perverts and stalkers because they try so hard to show the woman they like them so much its become a very fine line between the two. He who camps outside your house or follows you down the street on every move is a stalker maybe even a pervert yet this phrase stalker has been used outside of these actions such as stalking someones facebook profile. Question is in all honesty visiting a lady’s profile sending them nice non sleazy messages and fb pokes, does that really make that person a stalker or a person who wants to try anything and everything to impress you and grab your attention. A zero response to them could indicate a lack of interest because allot of women dont know how to tell a guy there not interested so they ignore them. That said many probably more than most men can not handle rejection but thats there problem not the womans.

I finished by saying:

Moral of the story is DO NOT BE CRUEL and string them along for your own ego. That really is cruel. If you dont like them tell them in a nice way, “Your really nice and everything but sorry your not my type” something like that. Everyone can know where they stand and no one gets lead down the garden path.

Yes men are supposed to chase women but your not supposed to ignore them, i also hope that this definition of a stalker is not perverted or misconstrued against a man who becomes besotted or a man trying hard to be romantic in the hope he could capture there heart and attention. After all the good guys put in the effort the bad guys just want sex quick simple and easy. I have another post discussing this something much more in-depth yet related to this post.

Love and peace.

 

 

21st Century Love decent men/woman don’t seem to exist

Recently on facebook one of my friends made a status update asking all she wanted for Christmas.

Here is what her status read…

 

  • The only thing I want for Christmas is a decent boyfriend… I don’t ask for much really, do I? Except decent men don’t seem to exist in the 21st Century… Not such a revelation, eh?

This made for a great topic and i felt compelled to respond yet in many cases it could be said the following reply would and could have fell on deaf ears.

Here is my reply:

Everyone’s perception of a decent man or woman is different. If we were all the same life would be one boring place.

All i can say on this is that you must open your eyes, that decent man may not be what you percept as a decent man. The non-decent men you speak of are very good liars and in all fairness you will not see through there outer face, they will cheat you and fool you into thinking there decent only to find the truth later on down the line.

That said you can find many decent men but will you be compatible well there is another thing… No one should change for anyone else but only compromise reasonably. We are again all individuals. Never try and change anyone let love grow naturally, give it a chance with a decent man.

This is turning into an essay yet its a deep subject so ill stop here. Just look behind you there are more decent men than not. Never find this man in a night club there is only one reason men cultivate these establishments and you can guess why.

Remember a top quality romantic dinner date means something, an invite for a drink means get your knickers off. Simple really. Hugs X

Now interestingly concidering her age being in the early 20’s one could argue it could be immaturity or maybe just the lack of knowledge, if so then it could well be connected to the education system and or upbringing.

The point being here is that many women reject a man asking a woman out to a romantic dinner date in today’s day where they are more inclined to accept that bar/night club night out drink. It does not take a genius to work out that the majority of men would be taking a girl out for drinking in these places for one thing and one thing only, or at least that’s what there intention is at the start anyway.

Spending some time to really understand a persons real intentions by there initial actions is something that is becoming lost in the 21’st century. I do not mean judge on this just being able to have the capabilities to question motives in all situations.

The final question that leaves us to ponder on is:

  • Why when asking a woman to a quality romantic dinner date in today’s day make the woman turn her nose up, disinterested and not willing to participate in the date?