Badoo.com Incident of lulz

Cross Chatting LULZ

Site users creating cross chat for lulz using a phone number.

Wow what a odd title, yes it is a bit odd but also rather amusing once you read further on what it is.
If you struck a note and know exactly what it is that would be because you have either done it or know someone who has, fair play to you.

First of here is the joker and she being a good looking woman(I shall refrain from the use of lady at present) certainly would attract allot of male attention to which probably gets men throwing their numbers at them without even saying hello.

badoojoanne24.2

Joanne from Market Harborough

[ad]

It start of simple enough with me sending a descent message, complimenting how attractive she looks and so on. Her profile description had said “Just say hello” so i messaged and said hello.

What i got back was a Telephone number, no words or any responding text at all so i thought lets text it. Oddly the response was not Joanne but of course another man by the name of Darin. Quickly i had determined what this young woman had actually done so i messaged her knowing i would get no reply.

Then a voice call was made, our theories turned out to be correct.

I don’t know what other peoples opinions are regarding this but to me i found it funny. Its hard to take dating sites seriously anymore, if you don’t know what i mean you should read my other post from Evow.

Now if someone is messaging you on a dating site and you just end up getting someones number out the blue before you have even spoken to them properly it is fair guess to suspect this kind of situation is occurring. Now although i found it rather funny i am certain others would not, in fact the other guy who was affected because of Joanne did not sound very happy at all. I think he was a little upset, Dude i know its a sick trick but seriously lighten up a little, after all this trick was pulled on me too lol.

There is something that concerns me out of this and i think it has a clear message to drill home. Ever read or heard the story of boy cried wolf, there will be occasions when this will be a genuine situation which will be seen as just another joke. That could well cause harm but in all fairness if you end up with a number from a stranger you contacted that you have not actually chatted with for a good period of time before exchanging numbers then i guess 9/10 its going to be a prank.

The second thing it indicates as a lesson to take away from this is that there are men out there that are happy just to dump there numbers out to strangers on the Internet, whether its on dating websites or not. Guys seriously your doing it wrong. My concern is that due to the actions of this woman now a total stranger actually has my number which actually raises a whole new set of dangers. For the most part the inconsiderate and foolish actions of another could well end up with a catastrophic outcome.

Take what you will in a teaching from this post and think about it, use your intelligence and consider the effects of your actions.

73’s all the best and stay safe, f1r31c3r signing off. Well i am actually off to cook me my dinner as i have a nice chicken breast marinating in the fridge that i fully intend to enjoy after cooking with a nice glass of red wine.

ez readers

[ad]

Turkey raping Cyprus again

Cyprus a victim again.

The Proof is here.

Some very interesting developments have occurred since 2007, yea that long ago but are very relevant at present. In fact so relevant it could well be a little scary for the civilian population of the island of Cyprus. The title says it all Cyprus the victim once again.

The southern side of Cyprus has decided it would begin drilling for natural gas, once Ankara(Mainland capital of Turkey) heard of this they sent military escorted survey vessel.

Cyprus was invaded over 35 years ago on the claims that Greek Cypriots were treating Turkish ottoman Turks inhumanely on the island. The Greek Cypriots argument was well they should ship up and leave back to Turkey. Turkey refused these people to return to Turkey never the less the Greek Cypriots were what can only but be described as racist to the Turkish Cypriots on the island. Turkey then decided to invade the island to effectively put a stop to the racist violence being committed by the Greek Cypriots. Continue reading

Karma

A question i ask you a Question!

 

Recently on facebook someone posted about Karma. Interesting subject and one that is rather contradictory at times not to mention open to opinion one which i think i had in the comments to my friend who posted the status on karma.

It was asked on there status:

who is the person that deals with karma ? who says, what wrong deserves what punishment ??

For which i replied, note this is my opinion based as a response i thought i would blog for your food for thought. Continue reading

Piracy enforcement violating freedom ACTA/SOPA/PIPA

Piracy enforcement on a computer violates our freedom

This is such a simple concept to understand yet not even the huge brains in government can actually grasp this concept. Maybe there just as much brainwashed as everyone else.

Well sit back read and get ready to have your mind unlocked, set free in the understanding of true freedom in this concept.

I recently watched a video on youtube of an interview with Richard Stallman. Now the Two Muppet’s interviewing Richard placed some great arguments but because there minds could not grasp this concept they failed miserably to answer any further questions and became argumentatively stuck on a simple concept. It may have had something to do with there simple thinking narrow mind built on the current financial money machine.

Remember were talking about freedom NOT making money…

Here is the video first its a long video but you can skip it and read on then come back to it if you wish ill keep the concept running without the need to watch the video.

So the problem comes about when we think about how to actually understand why enforcing piracy actually violates our freedom. Here are a few models to set the stage of thought. Continue reading

FREE Software Freedom

Freedom Free software Vs Proprietary business

 

I thought i would make a blog post about Free software that would be Free as in freedom to do as you wish. The current understanding of this on the net and around the world is a bit sketchy. Many people think there is unemployment attached to free software and or releasing source code of a application.

Points i want to cover in this post:

  • Business with open and closed source
  • Differences between open source and free software
  • Closed source software
  • Microsoft Business model (closed source software)
  • Freedom
  • Human Rights(not man made rights)
  • Sheepeople

The video bellow is a long video of a lecture speech that Richard Stallman gave in India. Mainly for the education and progression to the schools and children studying in India.

It point in the video is that as an education authority not just in India but worldwide is that education must enforce the principles of freedom, NOT to be locked down to a proprietary software. Children MUST be educated to be able to choose whatever route they wish to choose in life. No one must restrict or stop you in any way. Richard goes on at the end of the video to explain how Microsoft and Autodesk AutoCAD give Gratis copies to the schools as to manipulate the children to become proficient in a proprietary commercial expensive piece of software. Effectively making the children dependent on there proprietary closed source software. Much like a addictive drug. I hope my readers can be open minded enough to understand the severe dangers to our children and freedom today. Continue reading

UK Council TAX summons scandal Followup

Follow up to the council tax scandal

 

Hello all and thank you to everyone who left all the great feedback and lovely comments.

In response to many comment’s including a full set of new developments over the past months i feel compelled to share the findings with you the world.

As with everything i say in my blogs i always meet my words and this time is no exception. In fact this follow up post has something of a treat for you all.

Following my post on UK council TAX scandal corruption I had mentioned contacting your local constituent well I did. That being Nicky Morgan, nice enough lady well i linked her to my post which she had read and gave me a written reply by mail.

This i would like to share with the world, i have blanked out personal info and uploaded as so all can read the letter.

Some very interesting points and small technicality corrections on my post. yes it might make you giggle.

For the case Nicky responds to she consulted the deputy director at charnwood borough council called David Platts. I am releasing this info not in a slanderous manor at all, it is just for completeness.

The following was pulled out and quoted from the previous post

In the event of failure to pay council TAX twice, the individual in question is summoned to court and required to pay £62.50 for court costs.

She admits this is the case and goes on to say that it may only take one payment before a summons is issued. This again proves that the system is broken in that the so called reminder notices sent are enough to be considered a defaulted payment. It is correctly said that the reminder notice is then sent approximately 14 days after the supposed payment was missed. In reality even if you paid it late the notice will still arrive. When a person tries to speak to the department all they tend to get is, the computer automatically issues the notice etc and you don’t have a leg to stand on. Seriously if you cant get the software developers to make the system work for human beings then you need to find a developer that can. Were not robots, were human beings, meaning were alive and actually understand the word maybe, sort of, kind of not just yes or no, on or off.

I am assured that the policy for the first bill is just a bill and only after 14 days is the notice sent. Well now there is a thing you see  the council and there minions are not perfect. What i mean is they make mistakes them selves, there staff make miscalculations whatever the situation, the computer sometimes fails as mentioned above it does not take into consideration all possible variables, misfortunate events and so on. At which point you the average Jo public have no idea in many cases how this all works or even how to sort it. In many cases you just pay it to shut them up and get them off your back.

No where in the letter I got in response to my post from Nicky Morgan does it mention or address isues like this. How many times in the past 20 years ++ has a person paid these costs unfairly because they either could not handle the stress or had no idea how to.

Nowhere in the document does it also mention that it is illegal or legal for the arrogant members of staff in the department who are 100% dismissive and blame the computer system “Its the computer and that’s the way it is”.

As i mentioned in my original post I go on to say how if someone is paying there council TAX can be summoned. If someone is very hard up, that means struggling with there finances and was unable to pay on the exact date but pays it later in the month he would still get a summons. The unfair treatment of this is not addressed in the corresponding letter of response. Cleverly avoiding the main issues i would say there Nicky! good one.

It gets better as the letter goes on to speak about:

There is a discrepancy regarding the payment date being set as the first of each month. If people recieve there salary at the end of the month, funds take 3 days to clear, in which time they may already be late to pay there council TAX and face paying an extra £62.50(summons cost)

Once again the political correctness of cleverly worded paragraph follows explaining how they calculate the financial year. Stating that plans run from the 1st April to the 1st January and only by direct debit does the council allow further payment date options to be the 3rd and 25th of every month, with 14 days prior to the payment date, you are to be issued with a notice that payment is due on this date(generally 14 days of the date of letter).  Basically your life means nothing, diddle squat, finito, worthless to them, just pay on that date that’s the way our system works. That’s our rules and you will abide by our rules, there is no highway just our way.

Now about the court hearing. There seems to be a slight discrepancy about this, something that i think central government would like to look into. I wont release recorded telephone calls incriminating the person(individual) in this area but it is a concern that i personally don’t think will be dealt with. It is the scaremongering, the threatening behaviour . You must at all costs not allow them to get to you in this way.

I spoke about them not letting you in to put your case forward to the judge and as mentioned above the staff attitude from the enforcement department is disgusting to say the least. If you actually get a smile out of them you have done well. The phone call i mentioned regarding this actually records not a singular member of staff but more than one on different occasions  clearly stating that in there belief it is pointless even going to court as you wont be allowed to enter the court room, so pay the summons cost(outstanding balance) in full before the court hearing and we shall remove it from the court. Note the remove from the court but not removal of summons costs. follow this up by:

“But if i am to pay £62.50 i want to get what i pay for and want my hearing before the court, I shall take my picnic basket and the kids, be a nice day out don’t you think? Bargain for £62.50. Do they have a kettle for the instant pot noodle.”

That sounds just like a hustle would you not say, direct from the council departments enforcement staff. I mean this in a non sexist way but all these so called officers were female. All the contacts with a male officer were not met with this ferocity or tack and deserves nothing more than the type of response I have given above.

  • Bellow are the high resolution scanned images of the letter i received.



  • And page 2



To conclude:

The bellow as before in my post if followed and strongly fought you will win.

Make sure you follow the additional steps listed bellow, all chargeable if asked to do something further:
  1. Follow there complaints procedure and exhaust it completely to the point nothing further can be done to resolve the situation.
  2. File the complaint that had not been resolved by the local authority to the local government ombudsmen along with the complaint response correspondence you got from the above complaint procedure.
  3. File the further complaint if both the above failed to the government ombudsmen with all the above correspondence and so on. Find further information on this here. Dont forget togoogle search too
  4. Invoice the council for all your time, charges etc. Do everything possible to get paid and then pay of there charges. Take the excess money you have earned from the above and give it to charity or a random homeless person on the street. At least by him a bottle of booze with some of it, share it out etc. Now that’s public money well spent lol just kidding.
  5. Further note to this would be to also contact your elected constituent and keep mailing them all the outcomes, concerns complaints views you have crucial improvements and actions your taking as when corruption like this happens it really does no good for there image or respectability.

UK Council TAX Scandal corruption summons

Council TAX practice worst than the bankers.

Hello my good readers and welcome to another blog post on a serious note regarding council TAX in the UK. The scandalous scheming cons and how a agreement passed in 1992 by the previous conservative government has come back to attack the poor.

We all know how annoying and painstaking it can be trying to communicate and resolve issues with the council TAX departments across the UK or should we call them local criminals.

Interestingly here is the 1992 legislation for council TAX enforcement that we will refer to bellow:

Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992, particularly Regulations 33 to 35.

Now you may think the above is all in order and perfectly fine, we all have to pay the TAX blabla blaaa. Yes i agree and yes we do as council TAX pays for the police force, Fire service, refuse and street cleaning as well as the salt gritters, pedestrianized repair/development drainage etc. Weather you like it or not we all need and enjoy these services that it provides so we pay for it.

The problem begins when local councils begin to pervert the above regulation sections 33 and 35. Just when you thought it was all fine to have such a regulation it gets perverted out of all control and in today’s day 20 years since it was made this perverted legislation busts out into the open for some to see, hopefully now everyone can see it.

It is fair to say that the legislation (if you have not read it already) states that on two defaults meaning you fail to pay your council TAX not once but twice you will be summoned to court to be challenged as to why you failed to pay your council TAX not once but twice, fair comment so far would you not say.

Summons costs at present are £62.50 and for a low income person/families this is allot of money, if there circumstances are difficult there council TAX alone is hard to pay. Hitting them with another £62.50 summons cost is really not the way to go for starters. It makes me laugh when the government criticize bankers for there bonuses and or bank charges and then they them selves are guilty beyond all question of a doubt of the same criminal activity.

Now the argument against this is that people who default and do not(maybe they refuse to pay) there council TAX must be summoned and it is the cost of the court for which the £62.50 is for. Because the council TAX enforcement is actually run by public money (Council TAX oh yea your money is not just for fire service and so on but also to pay for the collection and accountant staff on stupidly high wages that we could do without or at least cut the cost to).  The summons cost is to be paid by the person(s) not paying there council TAX. I am sure many readers are saying tuff tits at the screen right now regarding this but remember if someone is having difficulty paying there council TAX due to low income or whatever, is it fair to hit them with a higher bill.

If you think the above is fair or unfair you have not heard the worst of it yet so read on. Continue reading

Guys are supposed to chase the women

Hello all

Just another crazy sane blog post haha.

Its a new year frosh 2012 and i cant speak for others yet i fell there is allot of love in the air, with valentines approaching in February and the time moving very fast it pleases me to see people actually paying attention to courting and the fun aspects of dating and relationships.

A friend of mine on FaceBook posted an intriguing status which got a fair level of attention something that men related to more than women, maybe it has to do with the lack of education in schools today in relationships and dating. Saying that though i dont think its is the schools problem to teach children today the correct respectful way to treat a lady or approach a lady if one wants to fall in love with her. It is of course the parents responsibility yet parents can only teach there children if they know how to themselves. Thats why it is very important to have both parents mother and father in any upbringing.

Cutting to the chase the status i found intriguing that triggered me to post this was:

  • Ur the guy, ur supposed 2 chase after us. we pretend not 2 notice u because we want 2 c how hard u r willing 2 try. 😉

Apart from the modern short hand lingo or urban dictionary usage she has a very valid and intriguing post. In this response the word STALKER is used which poses an interesting point by some other posts posted in the comments one was:

  • If you chase and they don’t like it your a STALKER

Me being me i could not resist but respond to this with:

I agree but you still need to give a dog a bone as one puts it. Due to the reaction from some women calling men perverts and stalkers because they try so hard to show the woman they like them so much its become a very fine line between the two. He who camps outside your house or follows you down the street on every move is a stalker maybe even a pervert yet this phrase stalker has been used outside of these actions such as stalking someones facebook profile. Question is in all honesty visiting a lady’s profile sending them nice non sleazy messages and fb pokes, does that really make that person a stalker or a person who wants to try anything and everything to impress you and grab your attention. A zero response to them could indicate a lack of interest because allot of women dont know how to tell a guy there not interested so they ignore them. That said many probably more than most men can not handle rejection but thats there problem not the womans.

I finished by saying:

Moral of the story is DO NOT BE CRUEL and string them along for your own ego. That really is cruel. If you dont like them tell them in a nice way, “Your really nice and everything but sorry your not my type” something like that. Everyone can know where they stand and no one gets lead down the garden path.

Yes men are supposed to chase women but your not supposed to ignore them, i also hope that this definition of a stalker is not perverted or misconstrued against a man who becomes besotted or a man trying hard to be romantic in the hope he could capture there heart and attention. After all the good guys put in the effort the bad guys just want sex quick simple and easy. I have another post discussing this something much more in-depth yet related to this post.

Love and peace.

 

 

I bet you have a tight little pussy

Another blog post of something i found interesting on our social networking experiences that is worth putting into a blog.

    [ad]

I was recently scanning across the social networking when i came across a young lady posting some remarks about a boy messaging her crudely.

Here is the original post:

  • What response does the guy who has never even said hello and sent ‘I bet you have a tight little pussy’ expect Flaming idiot

Well i just could not resist but respond to this so i did with the following raising what i consider to be some very valid issues:

The famous pretty boy ask. This is said allot not to mention other sad tasteless lines. Before jumping on the bandwagon about this it needs to be pointed out that these pretty boys actually get laid by asking and saying things like that.

There pretty boys they could drop there pants and shit in front of a girl and she would still open her legs for him, yes that fickle and lame. If the girl had more substance about her then this would not happen.

The response you gave him(if any) just makes him attack you because these boys have grown to think you cant live without there cock. In many cases it is true too and girls will admit that, if there drunk enough that is.

I no pretty boy and all i can say to all the pretty boys is there are far more of us ugly mother fuckers up here than there is of you out there so run fast. lol

    [ad]

Just an interesting point into the real world actions of those behind closed doors.

21st Century Love decent men/woman don’t seem to exist

Recently on facebook one of my friends made a status update asking all she wanted for Christmas.

Here is what her status read…

 

  • The only thing I want for Christmas is a decent boyfriend… I don’t ask for much really, do I? Except decent men don’t seem to exist in the 21st Century… Not such a revelation, eh?

This made for a great topic and i felt compelled to respond yet in many cases it could be said the following reply would and could have fell on deaf ears.

Here is my reply:

Everyone’s perception of a decent man or woman is different. If we were all the same life would be one boring place.

All i can say on this is that you must open your eyes, that decent man may not be what you percept as a decent man. The non-decent men you speak of are very good liars and in all fairness you will not see through there outer face, they will cheat you and fool you into thinking there decent only to find the truth later on down the line.

That said you can find many decent men but will you be compatible well there is another thing… No one should change for anyone else but only compromise reasonably. We are again all individuals. Never try and change anyone let love grow naturally, give it a chance with a decent man.

This is turning into an essay yet its a deep subject so ill stop here. Just look behind you there are more decent men than not. Never find this man in a night club there is only one reason men cultivate these establishments and you can guess why.

Remember a top quality romantic dinner date means something, an invite for a drink means get your knickers off. Simple really. Hugs X

Now interestingly concidering her age being in the early 20’s one could argue it could be immaturity or maybe just the lack of knowledge, if so then it could well be connected to the education system and or upbringing.

The point being here is that many women reject a man asking a woman out to a romantic dinner date in today’s day where they are more inclined to accept that bar/night club night out drink. It does not take a genius to work out that the majority of men would be taking a girl out for drinking in these places for one thing and one thing only, or at least that’s what there intention is at the start anyway.

Spending some time to really understand a persons real intentions by there initial actions is something that is becoming lost in the 21’st century. I do not mean judge on this just being able to have the capabilities to question motives in all situations.

The final question that leaves us to ponder on is:

  • Why when asking a woman to a quality romantic dinner date in today’s day make the woman turn her nose up, disinterested and not willing to participate in the date?